Leibniz's Formula for Radius of Curvature
The radius of a circle drawn through three infinitely nearby points on a curve in the
-plane satisfies
where denotes the arclength. For example, if
, so
, then
If the curve is given parametrically, and
, so
, then
Changes
Consider three points on a curve with equal distances
between the points. Let
and
denote the angles between the horizontal and the segments connecting the points as shown. We have the relation between the changes in
and
:
![]() |
(2) |
The difference between these angles, , is shown near
.
The angle between the perpendicular bisectors of the connecting segments is also , because they meet the connecting segments at right angles.
These bisectors meet at the center of a circle through the three points on the curve whose radius we denote . The small triangle with hypotenuse
gives
![]() |
(3) |
Small Changes
Now we apply these relations when the distance between the successive points is an infinitesimal . The change
![]() |
(4) |
with , by smoothness of sine (see above). Smoothness of sine also gives,
, with
Combining this with formula (1.1.3) for the infinitesimal case (assuming ), we get
, with
Now substitute this in (1.1.4) to obtain
, with
By trigonometry, , so
, as long as
is not infinitely large.
Keisler's Function Extension Axiom allows us to apply formulas (1.1.3) and (1.1.4) when the change is infinitesimal, as we shall see. We still have a gap to fill in order to know that we may replace infinitesimal differences with differentials (or derivatives), especially because we have a difference of a quotient of differences.
First differences and derivatives have a fairly simple rigorous version in Robinson's theory, just using the differential approximation (1.1.1). This can be used to derive many classical differential equations like the tractrix, catenary, and isochrone, see: Chapter 5 Differenital Equations from Increment Geometry in Projects for Calculus: The Language of Change on my website at http://www.math.uiowa.edu/%7Estroyan/ProjectsCD/estroyan/indexok.htm
Second differences and second derivatives have a complicated history. See
H. J. M. Bos, Differentials, Higher-Order Differentials and the Derivative in the Leibnizian Calculus, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, vol. 14, nr. 1, 1974.
This is a very interesting paper that begins with a course in calculus as Leibniz might have presented it.
The natural exponential
The natural exponential function satisfies
y[0] = 1 |
![]() |
We can use (1.1.1) to find an approximate solution,
Recursively,
:
, for
This is the product expansion , for
.
No introduction to calculus is complete without mention of this sort of "infinite algebra" as championed by Euler as in
L. Euler, Introductio in Analysin Infinitorum, Tomus Primus, Lausanne, 1748. Reprinted as L. Euler, Opera Omnia, ser. 1, vol. 8. Translated from the Latin by J. D. Blanton, Introduction to Analysis of the Infinite, Book I, Springer–Verlag, New York, 1988.
A wonderful modern interpretaion of these sorts of computations is in
Mark McKinzie and Curtis Tuckey, Higher Trigonometry, Hyperreal Numbers and Euler's Analysis of Infinities, Math Magazine, vol. 74, nr. 5, Dec. 2001, p. 339-368
W. A. J. Luxemburg's reformulation of the proof of one of Euler's central formulas
appears in our monograph, Introduction to the Theory of Infinitesimals, Academic Press Series on Pure and Applied Math. vol 72, 1976, Academic Press, New York.
Created by Mathematica (September 22, 2004)